Step 4: Audit the system
A practical framework for fair algorithmic pricing
Does it work?
Run a pre-committed audit protocol on pricing outputs. All design choices are fixed before examining data (Huang and Hooker 2026).
End-to-end audit flow
End-to-end flow for the fairness audit protocol (Huang and Hooker 2026):

Plan · Audit · Decide · Improve
Pre-audit setup
- Select criterion: proxy discrimination (PD) or conditional demographic parity (CDP)
- Specify legitimate factors X_\ell aligned with Step 1
- Set tolerance bands (e.g. 5% price gap, 0.80 adverse impact ratio)
- Design representative quote sample and power calculations
Statistical testing
Pricing algorithms are usually deterministic, so classical OLS/GLM standard errors are invalid. Huang and Hooker (2026) provides corrected variance for:
- CDP: test \beta_A in P_i = \mu_0 + \beta_A \mathbf{1}\{A_i=a\} + \gamma^\top X_{\ell,i} + \varepsilon_i
- PD: coefficient shift \Delta = \phi_j - \phi'_j when protected attribute enters model
Use equivalence testing (TOST) so models pass only when data affirm compliance within tolerance, not merely fail to reject disparity.
Three outcomes
| Outcome | Action |
|---|---|
| Pass | Document; proceed with monitoring |
| Insufficient information | Collect more data or escalate to remediation |
| Fail | Remediate → re-test (return to Step 2 or Step 1) |
Governance and monitoring
| Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Accountable actuary | Audit protocol sign-off |
| Independent reviewer | Replicate corrected regressions |
| Model owner | Remediation on fail/unclear |
Re-audit on model change, regulatory update, or drift in CDP/PD statistics.
Checklist
References
Huang and Hooker (2026)
Xin and Huang (2024)
References
Huang, Fei, and Giles Hooker. 2026. “Fairness Testing for Algorithmic Pricing.” https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11614.
Xin, Xi, and Fei Huang. 2024. “Antidiscrimination Insurance Pricing: Regulations, Fairness Criteria, and Models.” North American Actuarial Journal 28 (2): 285–319.